new-massachusetts-sports-betting-proposal-contains-substantial-tax-hike-and-ban-on-in-play-betting

1 New Massachusetts Sports Betting Proposal Contains Substantial Tax Hike and Ban on In Play Betting

bet9ja.com
Massachusetts sports betting could look totally various if a new bill proposed in the Senate succeeds. And if history is any sign, controlled sports betting in other states could also change dramatically.

SD 1657 existed by Sen. John Keenan. "An Act Addressing Economic, Health, and Social Harms Caused by Sports Betting" intends to increase the existing sports betting tax rate from 20% to 51%. Additionally, Sen. Keenan requires a total restriction on live betting (in-game betting) and prop bets.
bet9ja.com
The main point to bear in mind is that Massachusetts has actually been at the leading edge of more stringent sports betting guidelines. The 2nd thing to understand is that the language of this costs is similar to the SAFE Bet Act, a federal piece of legislation presented in 2024.

This bill was presented not long after previous Massachusetts Governor and existing NCAA president Charlie Baker affirmed in front of the Senate in a meeting on sports betting guideline.
bet9ja.com
So, while this is presently a Massachusetts expense, it's most likely to impact other states that offer managed sports betting.
A closer take a look at SD 1657 Tax
Beginning with the tax rate increase, bringing sports betting to 51% has actually been a target for Sen. Keenan before. Keenan proposed a tax increase at the last legislative session, but it was declined. This boost would have been available in the state's spending plan costs.

Only 3 markets have tax rates of 51%, the greatest in the country: New York, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. At 20%, Massachusetts presently ranks sixth highest.
bit.ly Prohibiting live betting and prop betting
The step prohibits in-play (live betting) or prop betting. Just straight wagers would be permitted, restricting sportsbooks to using only moneyline, spread, and totals.

While Massachusetts and other markets have restrictions on collegiate betting, this would impact even expert sporting occasions.

The costs likewise seeks to include benefits and same-game parlays to the category of "unjust and misleading practices." Sportsbooks favour same-game parlays due to their high "hold" percentage, the amount of cash they keep off each $1 wagered.
Gamer Limits
SD 1657 also intends to develop necessary daily and month-to-month limitations for bettors. Bettors could not wager more than $1,000 a day and $10,000 a month without an 'price assessment' which includes examining savings account. A player can not wager more than 15% of the amount in their account.

Massachusetts would become the very first market to require a cost evaluation on bettors.
Advertising limitations
Keenan also wishes to get rid of advertising during televised sporting occasions. The measure would prohibit sportsbooks from running ads throughout games. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission has checked out producing a ban on in-game ads before. However, this did not go through as nationwide TV offers make this difficult to implement.
Will the step pass?
The measure is severe in its changes to the sports betting industry in Massachusetts. Banning prop betting and increasing the sports betting tax rate will likely cause pushback from local sportsbooks and market supporters.

Because of this, the procedure will likely be battled in the Senate and your home of Representatives. In the previous session, Keenan failed to raise the tax rate.

He would need to convince the other senators who did not support his initiative before to alter their minds. If and when the Senate discusses this step, it is impossible to inform how it will be received.